Dolmans, Solicitors                                                                                                                                                                                               8CF02269

Cardiff                                                                                                                                                                                                           30^th October 2008

Kirk v South Wales Police     5 Court Actions of Police Harassment       7CF07345

Abuse of Process Application

 Dear Sir,

• 1. Further to your 23rd October 2008 letter and His Honour Judge Chambers's Internal Memo, dated a year ago, the situation has not but changed, it has in fact changed for the worse.
• 2. Tomorrow, Friday, the HM Treasury Solicitor will quote from his defences against a judgment 8CF02269, by default, brought against the South Wales Police, 5^th Action, for my false imprisonment on the excuse his myriads were so engrossed in trying to get me certified as a Vexatious Litigant the 6^th Action was ‘overlooked' for 6 months.
• 3. HM Treasury Solicitor Internal Memos, you also have, indicate the legal process to get me certified has been going on now for 7 years without my contribution or even prior knowledge!
• 4. My fifty odd Judicial Review Applications were primarily against your client for trivial motoring matters costing me more to attend than the fines incurred. I suspected the convictions were going to be used against me by the Free Masons in the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons and your client's motive, when Inspector Collins of Barry Police wrote to the college in January 2001 in order to have my name removed from the register, proved to be correct. The deceit metered out in that debarcle is for another court both here and at Strasbourg. see http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/
• 5. Lord Justice Thomas in July 2007 told my barrister, in front of me, not to attend my Application for a Trial By Jury for the 3 Actions of false Imprisonment, CF6141159‐MC65, CF101741, CF204141 excuses ever since being that the transcript is ‘corrupted' and cannot be transcribed. Someone is lying.
• 6. 2 weeks later His Lordship stated in front of me and Mr Patrick Cullinane Esq. that he did not know just who should hear the Abuse of Process Application, discarded the papers as if an empty cigarette packet and proceeded to expedite my denial of a civilian jury against your client, the only purpose for bringing the 10 years of relentless police harassment cases in the first place.
• 7. Your 24^th October 2008 letter again refuses to admit police burgled my veterinary surgery to re instate their police inspector's daughter into my flat, admit there was a magistrates hearing on the 9 month investigation, both sides of the English Channel, into my purported ownership of a Guernsey Registered Veterinary Ambulance, eventually ‘stolen' before your client as bailee or there was any arson on my home.
• 8. Your 24^th October letter goes on to say my requests direct to Barry Police, dated 4th October 2008 and to the Chief Officer, Ms Barbara Wilding, dated 2^nd October 2008, to identify the progress on 39 random samples of police incident numbers, all related to the Actions currently before Sir Nicholas Chamber QC, is wrong. You again prevaricate complaining I should write to you...what utter nonsense. Each incident number was created by your client in a standard covering letter indicating in plain English I was to write to the South Wales Police on the progress of recovery of my stolen goods, apprehension of ‘tipped off' villains in the Barry area for arson, theft, burglary and assault, all ‘modus operandi' mysteriously stopping the very day Inspector Collins had achieved my being ‘struck off' the veterinary register on 29th May 2002.
• 9. My miserable 10 years in Guernsey at least taught me to pick up a law book, albeit Normandy Law, not Code Nepolian, as no advocate was allowed to act for me or allow me legal representation from the UK. I have again looked at the books and it is plain to me the track record of your client during the 10 years of harassment is an exact copy of the conduct of the Guernsey Insular Authority that led me to the Privy Council more times than any other known litigant in the past century. Guernsey harassment was Free Mason motivated.
• 10. Normandy Law and I suspect UK Law on Tort is based on similar principles.

4^th Action 7CF07345, as Amended, will contain, in each incident, once there has been full disclosure by your client:

• 1) The police have a public duty to properly investigate crime
• 2) There has been a breach of that duty
• 3) Maurice Kirk and his family have suffered damage.
• 4) There is evidence of malice. ‘Proximity' argument is exactly why the police continue to refuse to admit they have record of the 100 or so indexed incidents that led to my ignored March 2008 Court Application requesting a Sworn Affidavit by the police that they have the contrary, ‘no such records'.

The amended 1^st, 2^nd, 3^rd, 4^th & 5^th Action will have further samples of Misfeasance by the relevant public authorities, already identified in the 16 years of litigation and criminal conduct by certain parties with whom you acquaint.

I again apply to the Cardiff County Court for an adjournment in these proceedings, 7CF07345, as I do for CF6141159‐MC, CF101741, CF204141 & 8CF02269 and again apply to the court on an Application of Abuse of Process and for the Court to Order proper Section 31 Disclosure by the South Wales Police or whatever other appropriate law based on their criminal conduct. 

I, Maurice John Kirk, confirm the content of this my witness statement, supported by 16 years of documentation, most already before the court or under the control of CPS, RCVS and the South Wales Police, is true.

Cc John Smith MP